Before execution begins, the human subject must remain explicit.
This execution model is instantiated and stress-tested in high-friction operational environments, including cross-border trade workflows where execution produces irreversible institutional effects.
This model is derived from direct experience with production systems, failure modes, and irreversibility in real execution environments.
Execution is evaluated not by task completion, but by narrative progression under rhythmic governance.
Scope
This execution model applies to systems where semantic intent initiates actions with persistent effects and delegated responsibility.
It does not address advisory, assistive, or non-consequential outputs.
Execution Chain
Semantic intent is not executable by default.
Execution proceeds only after:
- admissibility is established
- intent is transformed into constrained instructions
- execution produces traceable effects
Once execution begins, rollback is no longer guaranteed.
Failure and Responsibility
Execution failure is not a model issue.
Failure is classified as:
- semantic inadmissibility
- structural interruption
- responsibility discontinuity
Each failure mode requires explicit handling before execution is permitted.
Enables / Refuses
This execution model enables:
- auditable task completion
- responsibility transfer across agents
- replayable execution traces
It explicitly refuses:
- implicit execution
- silent side effects
- best-effort completion without accountability
Execution is evaluated not by task completion, but by narrative progression under rhythmic governance.